This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that both shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the shaker with the two holes.
What is the correct choice? If you can, please give a reason for your answer.
Heh, this is trivial, but I think that it's clear that salt should go in the shaker with two holes, simply because it's finer than pepper and comes out more readily. (This has nothing to do with the fact that I use *way* more pepper than salt, I assure you. :)
-- **************************************************************** "Villians always have antidotes. . . they're funny that way" --The Tick **************************************************************** Jody Reed-- --jo...@cc.gatech.edu
stevenh...@aol.com (StevenH113) wrote: >This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two >openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that both >shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the >shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the >shaker with the two holes.
>What is the correct choice?
The reason for the difference in the shakers is that the texture of salt and pepper are different. Since salt will flow through the holes more rapidly than pepper will, salt shakers generally have fewer holes than pepper shakers.
StevenH113 <stevenh...@aol.com> wrote: >This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two >openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that both >shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the >shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the >shaker with the two holes.
>What is the correct choice? If you can, please give a reason for your >answer.
i think that the salt should be in the one w/two holes. i have seen salt and pepper sets where there is some funky anti-humidity clot near the exit hole (uh, for lack of better terms), and it had one hole, whereas the pepper had numerous holes.
also, in light of how good sodium is for your body, best keep the salt shaking to a minimum, and use the one w/fewer openings for salt.
-j.
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- I spent four years prostrate to the higher mind, got my paper And I was free - indigo girls
Standards for this very important issue by Professor Mise en Place in the 17th century: salt three, pepper two. But those crafty American salt and pepper manufacturers started the "S" and "P" trend, which sent the hole counters into a tizzy.
The wife is right...as always. -- ___________________________________________________________________________ _ Anne Bourget bour...@netcom.com Sacramento, California
: This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two
Not only is it trivial, but it points up a bad design. Anything that needs to be explained or figured out will be irritating over time and awkward for guests. I used exactly such shakers at my sister's house at Thanksgiving, and my logic was different' I thought that pepper would be in the one with fewer holes, since it's more powerfully flavored and people will want to avoid overdosing their food. Wrong!
It's good manners to make guests feel at ease. I reject this sort of puzzle-piece. Similarly, I wouldn't serve food that's extraordinarily awkward to eat, or provide fragile crystal, or do anything else to make a guest feel embarrassed. My own shakers are transparent clear glass, with tops that screw on firmly, and holes that don't clog easily.
In article <49ddq8$...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> stevenh...@aol.com (StevenH113) writes: >From: stevenh...@aol.com (StevenH113) >Subject: Help settle the salt and pepper shaker debate!! >Date: 27 Nov 1995 17:24:08 -0500 >This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two >openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that both >shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the >shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the >shaker with the two holes.
At my house it doesn't matter, because everyone takes the lid off the pepper in order to get enough....:-)
Nancy Dooley
"A cheerful look makes a dish a feast"...Herbert, Jacula Prudentum
josh...@quads.uchicago.edu (idlewild) wrote: >In article <49ddq8$...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, >StevenH113 <stevenh...@aol.com> wrote: >>This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two >>openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that both >>shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the >>shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the >>shaker with the two holes.
>>What is the correct choice? If you can, please give a reason for your >>answer. >i think that the salt should be in the one w/two holes. i have seen salt >and pepper sets where there is some funky anti-humidity clot near the >exit hole (uh, for lack of better terms), and it had one hole, whereas >the pepper had numerous holes.
And to help keep the salt from clogging up, you can mix it with uncooked rice kernels in the shaker. The salt comes out, the rice stays put and absorbs any moisture in the container.
stevenh...@aol.com (StevenH113) writes: > This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two > openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that both > shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the > shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the > shaker with the two holes.
> What is the correct choice? If you can, please give a reason for your > answer.
> Thanks for your input.
It used to be that the shaker that allowed more out (either more holes or larger holes) was for the salt. The one that allowed less out was for the pepper, the idea being that you didn't want your food too spicey, but most people wanted a lot of salt.
Now that we have exactly the opposite values, I dunno what to do about the shakers. We always use a grinder : )
>This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two >openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that both >shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the >shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the >shaker with the two holes.
>What is the correct choice? If you can, please give a reason for your >answer.
The pepper goes in the one with two holes, and the salt with three. The three possible reasons I can offer are i) you usually use = less pepper because it is a stronger spice and ii) historically it was very expensive and this kept you from using too much (I thin= k this comes from the British). THe most important rationale that I can offer, however, is that my mother says to put the salt in t= he one with three, and the pepper in the one with two ;-)
> stevenh...@aol.com (StevenH113) writes: > This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two > openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that both > shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the > shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the > shaker with the two holes.
> What is the correct choice? If you can, please give a reason for your > answer.
> Thanks for your input.
I always put the salt in the shaker with the more holes, simply because one nearly always uses more salt, proportionately, than pepper. In the case of shakers that have the same number of holes, but one set of holes is smaller, I use the same premise. Just my .02
Patricia Posius <tr...@alcor.concordia.ca> wrote: >>This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two >>openings in the top and the other one has three openings.
>>What is the correct choice?
I vote for pepper = fewer holes, salt = more holes. Why? Because it was always that way! But seriously, I think it stems from when salt was nothing to be concerned about dietarily, it was common and used constantly. Pepper, however, was "spicy" and used very sparingly. It seemed to be more exotic. Please .. no laughing. It's just how I seem to recall it. Maybe it's my mother's fault!
But, since I've been using a pepper mill for years now, who cares?! 8)
> Of course my new shakers say S & P on them so that took away some of > my quandry. But interestingly enough - they have the same number of > holes!
Think of the assembly line that makes the shakers.
If they make 2 different kinds, they need more equipment. In the interest of lower production costs the consumer loses what has always been a God given right, pepper shakers with less holes.
You're lucky they put the S & P on them! Wait until they get even more 'efficient' and make you label them yourself! ;-)
>>In article <49ddq8$...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, >>StevenH113 <stevenh...@aol.com> wrote: >>>This may sound trivial, but we have two shakers and the first has two >>>openings in the top and the other one has three openings. Given that >both >>>shakers are the same size and color, I think the salt should be in the >>>shaker with the two holes and my wife thinks the pepper should be in the >>>shaker with the two holes.
>>>What is the correct choice? If you can, please give a reason for your >>>answer.
>>i think that the salt should be in the one w/two holes. i have seen salt >>and pepper sets where there is some funky anti-humidity clot near the >>exit hole (uh, for lack of better terms), and it had one hole, whereas >>the pepper had numerous holes.
>And to help keep the salt from clogging up, you can mix it with uncooked >rice kernels >in the shaker. The salt comes out, the rice stays put and absorbs any >moisture in >the container.
: Standards for this very important issue by Professor Mise en Place in the : 17th century: salt three, pepper two. But those crafty American salt and : pepper manufacturers started the "S" and "P" trend, which sent the hole : counters into a tizzy.
**** It is not the number of holes that is important.. One is really enough, but it is the SIZE... Salt comes in larger grains than Pepper
But then again, just like so many we things discuss here.. The size is not nearly as important as what you do with it...
Cooking is one of several Creative Sports..
Bill Hilbrich Student of Humanity and Pond Scum, and a Nasty, but gentle Protector of White Swans.
In a recent message STNN...@prodigy.com (Robert Halem) tells us: *It depends on what side of the Atlantic you live on. * *In the US....more holes is salt. *In England....more holes is pepper (salt is usually just one). * *Don't know why.
Maybe because salt is notorious for enhancing flavour? <grin>
-- I am: mom, attorney, fathers' rights advocate, founder of F.R.E.E.(tm) *--> Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange info: http://www.vix.com/free/ To join the Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange: free-j...@vix.com SEEKING: Alan Banning, Gil Oxley, Andy Potter, & Lorna Taylor (all from MA)
: *In the US....more holes is salt. : *In England....more holes is pepper (salt is usually just one). : This isn't exactly considered rocket science over here...
No, it's another example of the irresistable human urge to create conflicting standards. Whenever a choice is completely arbitrary but has far-reaching consequences, people screw it up. Examples:
Which side of the road should we drive on? Should wall switches go up or down to turn on the lights? Put a slash through the letter O or the number zero? Use a comma or a period for a decimal point? Represent the second day of March as 3/2/96 or 2/3/96? ... <<list has no end>>
: *It depends on what side of the Atlantic you live on. : * : *In the US....more holes is salt. : *In England....more holes is pepper (salt is usually just one). : * : *Don't know why. : : That's easy - it's because we're smarter :-) : : a) Grains of salt are relatively large and hydroscopic (which makes : them stick together). : b) Particles of ground pepper are relatively small. : : So salt shakers typically have one large hole to let the salt out, : pepper shakers many small holes to spread the pepper evenly. Otherwise : you get no salt and a solid trail of pepper - yuk! : Arghhhhhhhhhhhhh... I've been waiting for someone to point out that the real difference is that the pepper shaker's holes should be *larger* Usually, this is compensated by having fewer holes so that you won't get the food as hot as my son would want it in one shake. The reason for the larger holes is that the tasteless powder sold for table use really has no use: good shaker pepper has a grind coarser than that of shaker salt. As for a) above, table salt in the US has enough trace additives to keep it running properly in ordinary humidities. [We use canning salt in our shakers and it does clump]. --thelma : This isn't exactly considered rocket science over here... : : John (who of course doesn't have a pepper shaker but knows people who : do)
Ray Bruman writes: >No, it's another example of the irresistable human urge to create >conflicting standards. Whenever a choice is completely arbitrary >but has far-reaching consequences, people screw it up. Examples: >Which side of the road should we drive on?
The right side. The car was invented in the U.S. We drive on the right side. Ergo, the right side is the correct side.
>Should wall switches go up or down to turn on the lights?
That drives me nuts. Don't you just hate it when one room has two switches and they get out of synch? Me, too.
>Put a slash through the letter O or the number zero?
I was taught to slash the letter O, but one company I worked for insisted on slashing the 0 (zero). That drove me nuts, too. I finally stopped writing it and just typed everything.
>Use a comma or a period for a decimal point?
You got me there. I'm used to a period, but I've never had a significant problem relating to foreign nomenclature.
>Represent the second day of March as 3/2/96 or 2/3/96?
Brother, that's another one.
On the other hand, I write the date as 30 November 1995.
>... ><<list has no end>>
True, but I'm glad this one did.
Yes, I know you were making a point, but I couldn't resist playing the game.
Apologies to anyone who is annoyed by this post.
In truth, the right way is the way we're taught or whatever is the best way to do things for whatever purpose.
Does anyone remember the toilet paper controversy? Someone wrote to Dear Abby (or was it Ann Landers) and asked the correct way to load toilet paper: the end hanging over the top or coming up from underneath.
I think that's still raging...but the people who made the most sense were those who pointed out how cats love to unroll the whole thing when the end sheet is coming from the top.
*It depends on what side of the Atlantic you live on. * *In the US....more holes is salt. *In England....more holes is pepper (salt is usually just one). * *Don't know why.
That's easy - it's because we're smarter :-)
a) Grains of salt are relatively large and hydroscopic (which makes them stick together). b) Particles of ground pepper are relatively small.
So salt shakers typically have one large hole to let the salt out, pepper shakers many small holes to spread the pepper evenly. Otherwise you get no salt and a solid trail of pepper - yuk!
This isn't exactly considered rocket science over here...
John (who of course doesn't have a pepper shaker but knows people who do)
I haven't been to the Target chain of stores in a while, but I went there a week ago and found the neatest thing. I keep my "good" pepper mill and salt mill on my dining table and it's a pain to go get it to cook with. Target had mini-mills of different spices and herbs (pepper included) that were about 3" tall and about 1 1/2 " in diameter. The bottom of the jar is a plastic grinder with metal parts. It's relatively inexpensive and refillable. Just the handy little gadget to satify a shopping urge! ;-)
The *proper* thing is to serve pepper in a pepper grinder- pepper that's not fresh ground has a nasty, bitter flavor and is missing most of the interesting flavor- and salt in a salt *dish*, where you can see it.
Salt and pepper shakers are for collecting and arranging on shelves.